When it comes to the use of technology, I am inferior to a 4-year-old. This is proven to me at least once a day as my daughter plays effortlessly on her Leapster kindergarten game while I repeat the serenity prayer over and over to calm myself enough to prevent the throwing my of my new book Nook through the window. Despite receiving this wonderful gadget the week prior to Christmas, I still don’t have a single book loaded on it.
Part of my problem is that I’m such a cheapskate. I refuse to buy a book before I see what I can load from the public library for free. Barnes & Noble is a lovely place to spend an afternoon, but they sure don’t make it easy to avoid buying their books. (Or at least not easy for me.)
I know what you’re thinking, as any rational person would. “Where is your husband? Can’t he help?” The answers are: 1)on the couch, and 2)he refuses. He says it’s my project and I need to figure out how to use it myself.
He says these types of ridiculous things when he gets frustrated that I don’t know how to use anything I have. A year after receiving a super-duper camera, I still take every shot on the automatic setting. (Who do I look like, Annie Leibovitz?) Two years after getting this Mac, I can only use a couple of the applications. And don’t even get me started on my iPod. iTunes seems to have a personal hatred toward me. I don’t know what I ever did to those Apple people to make them treat me this way. And now it’s Barnes & Noble, damn them. It’s like all of Corporate America is judging me and making my life as difficult as possible. “Why?” I ask. WHY???
You are currently browsing articles tagged dum-dums.
Tags: dum-dums, resentment, saving money
I don’t know why I got my hopes up. I should have known it takes longer than 9 years to select some simple stockings for the mantle. (And we know M likes to take his time with his to-do list.)
From the first Christmas we were together, I have wanted stockings. Because M fancies himself to live in Maine or somewhere where reindeer sweaters are acceptable menswear, he insisted that he select our stockings himself. I don’t know if he is super-picky (yes) or if it is really that difficult to find 1980′s ski chalet fashions, but we have never gotten around to buying the stupid stockings.
Actually, to be fair, I should note that my mother made us some very nice stockings one year. The problem was she used her own socks as the pattern, and you can’t really stuff more than a candy cane and a couple of quarters into a size 5, which is not nearly enough for me. So back to the ski chalet stockings.
M’s mom gave us a stocking for little G this year (she’d accidentally ordered 2 from Land’s End). So this was the spark that lit the fire under M’s ass to finally buy some damn stockings for ourselves. He went online, ordered them, and they arrived within days. (Thank you, Land’s End.) The problem came when we unwrapped them. Mine said, “Momma”. Um, who is “Momma”? Is that like “Big Momma’s House”? I have always been “mama”, as was my mama and my grandmama (not to mention Thelma Harper).
So anyway, he had to return Momma’s stocking to Land’s End, whose customer service people were probably confused from the get-go thinking they were attracting a hipper, more urban demographic these days. Bless their hearts.
My new “Mama” stocking should be here soon, and maybe we’ll cross “stockings” off the to-do list for good. Then it will be a toss-up as to what M will tackle next – either shoring up the retaining wall like the inspector told us to do when we bought our home in 2002, or moving out of my dining room as I beg him to do each day? Or, naturally, there is always the third and most probable option – pause and reflect on the glory of the stockings. It’s a Christmas miracle!
UPDATE: the new stocking was ordered (by you-know-who) with the wrong pattern – the same as Daddy’s polar bear. So now he has to return it AGAIN. (!!!) The only stockings still available are the teddy bear for the over 70 crowd, and the very dark Santa/reindeer scene. How is it possible I will go stocking-less for another year?
I’ve come to a conclusion. I do not prefer “hard-hitting” news. I like my news light and fluffy. This is astounding to me, as I once looked down on people who watch the lightweight “Today Show.” Nowadays I’d much rather listen to fluff in the mornings than hear about which murders took place overnight, where the latest drug bust was located, or how our children are in danger everywhere they look.
This week on the fluff news, we debated such pertinent topics as “Should boys have long hair?”, “Should there be an iphone app for diagnosing sexually transmitted diseases?”, and “Is that really Michael Jackson singing on his new release?” My news team also reports on pressing community matters like dogs in costumes (send in a picture if you’d like to see your pooch on TV!), predictions from a bulldog named Sal on which team will win the big game of the week (he selects a dog bowl with the team’s logo), Pet of the Week (not to be confused with the costumed dogs – this is entirely different) and new restaurants in town. We were even lucky enough to have a robot stop by to help with the weather forecast, and a visit from those wacky SeaWorld animals!
Even the fluff news has to report the ugly news, but it’s more like an afterthought. They’ll spend 5 minutes talking about the smoothies they like, then, under his breath, one reporter might say, “Also, there was a murder last night. Now, who wants to hear about the festivals in town this weekend?”
I once feared being an airhead. Now I consider it a lifestyle choice, one that makes me less likely to hate my fellow Atlantans. Or, you know, kill myself (which is always a happy bonus).
Tags: dum-dums, people in the news
How come if some idiot in Mississippi hit a woman, called her a c^nt, and said she deserved to be raped by a pack of n!ggers (in addition to slurs against Mexicans, etc.), he would be called a “bigot”…yet when a celebrity does it, we want to say he is “mentally ill”?
I am eager to see what angle Mel Gibson’s PR machine takes on this one. Surely – Gold help us – they won’t send him to rehab for some disorder that causes his assholeness. Please let’s just call this what it is – an asshole being himself. Can one redeem himself from assholeness? Why, yes, absolutely. But not without honest, soul-searching work on the part of the asshole himself. And, let’s face it, that’s probably not going to happen.
So my proposed plan is that Mel buy himself an island where he may live freely amongst his own. (This could be next to Cheater Island, since some of the residents will inhabit both places.) Who shall we send to Asshole Island? I nominate Lindsay Lohan (too many reasons to list), David Duke (to serve as Expert Asshole), Paris Hilton (I know you aren’t seriously asking me why she needs to go to Asshole Island), Spencer Pratt (if we still know who he is), and Tonya Harding (just for vintage assholeness). What a reality show this could be! Seriously, Mark Cherry, CALL ME!
Who do you nominate for Asshole Island?
P.S. Not to be judgmental or anything…
Tags: celebrity stalking, dum-dums, irritants, judgmental people, people in the news
Have y’all been keeping up with this story about the Russian spies? To re-cap, several days ago, 10 people were arrested in the U.S. for being agents in an alleged spy ring. The arrests came as a result of a multi-year FBI investigation. There was one additional guy who was bailed out in Cyprus, but was supposed to check in nightly with police there. He did not check in Wednesday night.
Am I the only one who is baffled by all of this? First of all, I am reminded of the episode of “Gilligan’s Island” where the Japanese soldier takes the gang hostage because he is unaware the war has been over for quite some time. Did someone forget to tell these spies about the end of the Cold War? Some of them were married with kids and lived in the suburbs, completely assimilated into American society – and we all know what kind of super-secret government data we keep out here. Maybe they hoped a housewife would spill some details at the weekly bunco game.
And then, what about the guy missing from Cyprus? I’m no detective, but I’ve seen a few episodes of “24″, so I have to ask: did we expect him to check in each night? He’s a spy – they engage in these types of disappearing shenanigans all the time. DUH.
From the description of this operation, I think I could be a spy. Or an Interpol officer. Either way. Sheez.
Tags: dum-dums, housewives, people in the news

